Babies and the Boundary Conundrum

I have had a string of frustrating days for reasons completely unrelated to my child.  Add to this, though, a little one who wants to ride on my back all day and dangle from the railing, and I’ve discovered the recipe for Mommy Insanity.

The angst is partly caused by an endless stream of tough decisions.  Should I stop my son from breaking the TV and risk his screaming through my tutoring session or continue working in relative silence?  Would it be better to leave him on the big bed and worry about him falling or lie with him for an hour while he falls asleep?  Is it better to shriek when he bites me so that he gets the message or will that make him think that yelling is okay?

None of these are great options.

Setting boundaries is difficult for any parent, at every stage in child development.  With a 19-month-old, there are incredibly fuzzy lines of comprehension.  While he can answer my questions about what he wants to eat and whether or not we should go outside, he can’t be reasoned with when it’s time to stop playing with the neighbors’ cat.  So, tantrums ensue from each positively benign turn of events.

You parents of older children are probably nodding and smirking at my naivete, or thanking the universe that those days are behind you (or are they just coming around again because time is cyclical? ha!).  Like anything else, though, when you’re in the thick of it, you cannot see above, below, before, or behind yourself and the predicament of the moment.  The only important thing is to save yourself from a complete breakdown, which requires advanced breathing techniques when you are wrestling with a large toddler.

My personal pet peeve is having my personal space invaded too often.  Babies know how to do this well.  Yesterday, my precious boy thrashed around in my arms while I tried to rock him to sleep and, after I finally removed my hair from his hands, I emerged with scratches on my face and a boiling anger in my stomach.  At the end of the day, I just want to sit down in my own space.  I don’t even need to be doing anything; a lot of nothing is perfectly fine.  When that moment is ruined by a monkey man climbing onto my lap with fire trucks, I don’t react kindly.  Sometimes, I feel selfish for erupting in frustration, but I suppose it makes me fully human.

Somehow, each horrific period of claustrophobia, anxiety, and rashness passes, and your smiling child emerges once again.  My son only has to envelop me in a bear hug, complete with back tapping, and I magically forget about his monstrous qualities.  Perhaps those are the little gifts that were built into parenting from the very beginning, the ones that we can’t possibly explain to tantrum onlookers in the grocery store.

Luckily, the most embarrassing thing my son does in public is dance wildly while sitting in the shopping cart and elicit adoring laughter.

I hate to imagine that it could get any worse…but, alas, he hasn’t turned two yet.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Does Time Make Us Forgive or Forget?

“Now is just a little, bare, empty word in English, just a scrap between an ancient buried past and a starry future.”Jay Griffiths, A Sideways Look at Time

As I look around at my support network, I notice that I have forgotten a lot of the reasons I used to hold grudges.  People that I intentionally cut out of my life because of some disagreement or another are back, and I can’t seem to remember why I ever deleted them from my phonebook.

Or is it that the passage of time has allowed me to forgive transgressions that once seemed so grave?

I’m sure that embarrassment plays a part in this.  Everyone does and says stupid things during their teenage years.  My peer group seems to be growing out of the petty, gossipy stage and simply appreciating friends for who they are now.  I know that I’m not the person I was at 17, 18, even 20.  Surely, many others have changed and are ready to move forward with me into stronger friendships.

But is there any “moving forward” if time is not linear?  We think about the past as though we are far removed from it, when in some views, it is just as real as the present.  One of my favorite books, A Sideways Look at Time, presents a fascinating historical perspective on time and its role in various cultures:

Is time an arrow or a bicycle, a straight line or a circle?  Once, time was widely seen as cyclical; the Hopi image of time is a self-contained wheel, the Gabra peoples of East Africa have the idea of finn meaning fertility or plenty in the cycles of life, and in Hindu thought, time moves in the unimaginably long cycles of the Kalpas.  In the Aions of the ancient Greeks, eternity wheeled round over and over again, while the Stoics believed in the eternal regeneration of the cosmos.  Aristotle said ‘for even time itself is thought to be a circle’ and Plato described time as a ‘moving’ or ‘revolving’ image of eternity.  Throughout history, time seems to have been thought circular since it could not be separated from the cycling motions of the sun, moon and stars…The modern Western view of time is linear, moving like a ruler straight from past to present to future and in this it is highly unusual. (155-6)

I like the idea that time is a circle, because it feels more real to me than the old adage of history repeating itself.  Each time I encounter an old acquaintance or relive a memory, I feel as though there is no distinct line between then and now.  Then is now if it is defining my now.

When it comes to grudges, regrets, and mistakes, can we ever leave them behind?  If we subscribe to the cyclical view of time, the mere judgment of things as grudges, regrets, and mistakes seems completely irrelevant.

It is hard to break away from the vacuum of Western life, that which sucks us toward some invisible horizon.  There is no such thing as arrival, as being “done” with life.  While we can morph into different characters over different periods of time, we just ARE.  Even though I need to remind myself of this alternate vision of hours and days, it brings me great comfort and allows me to open up to today instead of worrying about what people once thought of me or will think of me in the future.  This is who, and where, I am now.  I am suddenly being stricken with the notion of that being enough.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Filed under: Social Issues | 1 Comment

My Caffeine Routine

I cannot remember a time when I didn’t drink loads of coffee.  Mostly strong, black coffee.

Even at a very young age, coffee equaled comfort for me.  My emotional addiction began with the aroma.  I awoke to it every day throughout my childhood, and it often met me after school or wafted into my bedroom in the early evening hours.  My mom (and her entire extended family) is to blame for that.  She would make coffee at night so the only task that remained for the morning was to push the button; it would be ready by the time breakfast was.  A testament to her commitment to the coffee-loving lifestyle is the fact that my dad once bought her a professional Bunn coffee maker — the one with two filters and two warmers.  Hot water was a flick away.

My brother and I used to be truly excited when, at age 4 or 5, we were allowed to have a few sips.  Other kids’ treats were cookies or candy…ours was black coffee.

By the time I was in middle school, my mom and I were afternoon regulars at the neighborhood Starbucks.  Some of the best memories of my life were during those years, when I had my mom all to myself (only on occasion sharing her with her friends).  We discovered the perfect amount of hazelnut syrup to add to a soy latte, and ordered it extra hot.  For awhile, we had designated mugs with our names on them so we didn’t have to worry about wasting to-go cups.

Those $4 drinks were more than indulgences or mental stimulants.  They symbolized to me the kind of connection that can happen nowhere else but in a jazz-filled room littered with newspapers and laptops.  I learned about social capital by observing the way that humans bond over several cups of java and a couple chocolate biscotti.

The coffee continued to pour its way through my body and drip along my life’s path.  In high school, I stopped at 711 almost every morning and bought huge cups of coffee for myself and my coffee buddy in first period.  I mentioned Starbucks more than once in my valedictorian speech.  The first thing I bought for my dorm room was a four-cup coffee maker.  The only thing I wasted euros on when I studied in Venice was an espresso at every cafe I could find.  And with every trip to the grocery, I sink deeper into the search for the perfect whole bean coffee.

I am not alone in my caffeine routine, but I don’t know too many others for whom coffee offers more than a jolt at an early hour.  I am not a grouch without it — I just feel incredibly vacant.

Instead of scaring my son with the grinder, I am eager to show him the magical intricacies of coffee, the drink, and coffee, the companion.  Unfortunately, one year old is even too young in my book.

P.S. – None of the myths about caffeine and kids are true.  My brother and I are both free of attention disorders and much taller than average.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Filed under: Mom Life | No Comments

The Effects of Aging

From what I can tell, the worst effect of aging is not the crow’s feet, slow metabolism, or lack of technological prowess.  It’s the overwhelming need to project one’s fears upon younger souls.

Since aging is relative, this effect hits every age group.  Even though I am very young in the grand scheme of life, I find myself speaking to my pre-teen or teenaged tutoring clients and relatives as though I have the answers to all their predicaments.  I tell them not to get so worried, not to rest their hopes on the generosity of a teacher or the devotion of a new love, and sometimes share stories from my middle or high school years.  After the fact, though, I always wonder how my mouth shifted into overdrive and why I couldn’t just listen and offer support instead of advice.

When I’m on the other side of the table, at the receiving end of words of “wisdom,” all I usually want to hear is silence and the occasional nod.  Perhaps it’s not the healthiest thing: just needing a pat on the back, but it’s a powerful desire nonetheless.  I am well aware of my own inability to absorb constructive criticism as just that, and have to fight the urge to hop on my defensive soapbox.  Still, there’s an interesting contrast that seems to smack twentysomethings in the face, regardless of which respective demons are perched on our shoulders.

We are asked to stand on our own two feet from birth (or maybe a few months thereafter), and get to enjoy wild celebrations and preposterous rituals each time we surpass a symbolic step toward complete independence.  We receive our first caps and gowns when we graduate from preschool, and come to expect the pomp and circumstance through years of academic and athletic achievement.  Then it’s on to the driver’s permit, the driver’s license, college acceptance letters — one tangible sign of approval after another.  Continue the excitement through college, and perhaps grad school, and it’s no wonder that we will look around for a dangling candy bar well into adulthood.

But that’s precisely when it all disappears.  For most, the post-college years are a period of great struggle with identity, money, and relationships.  We don’t know what we want, because no one is telling us what we want anymore.  Suddenly, every decision seems bursting with the potential for the big F-word: FAILURE.  That’s a particularly tough reality for someone like me, who never encountered an F in the past.

Given all the cultural and technological changes that stand between the generations, it’s difficult to discern the extent to which our sensitivity is about personality.  When anyone 10, 20, 30, even 50 years older than me offers a new viewpoint, it arouses my inner teenager and makes me want to hold up a shield.  I can tell myself it is that darn perfectionist that lives somewhere inside me, but I also wonder if it’s just a symptom of being 22.

Does every stage of life present the same challenge to each of its inhabitants?  Is there a right and wrong way to deal with those challenges?

My instinct is to say that if there were a right way, life would be rather pointless.  Upon reaching its end, what would we say we had learned?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Filed under: Social Issues | No Comments

Texting is Perplexing

I have been crawling through the trenches of chaos into which life occasionally throws us for the past week or so.  Thus, I apologize profusely for neglecting the blog.

Today,  as I was thumb-typing away, I wondered about the impact of texting on our styles of communication.  Like most other young people, I am often guilty of pulling out the cell phone during a conversation to have a secondary, parsed one with some other friend or family member.  While texting can be more discreet, it is potentially as rude as answering the phone while at lunch with a friend.

Both the best and worst part of texting is its immediacy.  Since it doesn’t require true interruption, it often elicits a quick response.  It’s useful in the “what do you want for dinner” sense.  But this benefit comes with implied pressure.  If you don’t answer within seconds…maybe up to three minutes, the other person will either get irritated or call you instead.  And we all know that a connected pal is most likely to have an emergency which requires text-style attention at the very moment when the phone is hiding in the bottom of your purse or balanced on the center console of your parked car.

Sometimes I go through a whole day feeling disconnected from my son because my mind has been lost in texts or TwitterBerry.  This world of instant answers exists on some plane that I cannot see, but definitely feel.  When I’m not texting, I’m waiting for a text.  Sometimes I make up a question or a need just to have an excuse to text someone.  Oddly enough, no one’s quick answer erases loneliness.  In fact, it can worsen boredom or sadness.  A one-word response that arrives an hour too late is enough to make anyone feel like everyone else must have a life, when the truth is probably closer to lost phone syndrome.

Virtual communication allows us to withdraw from face-to-face communication to such an extent that we sometimes prefer it.  Why have a real conversation, full of connotation and inflection, when we can have one that doesn’t even require “hello” or “goodbye?”  The 160-character message has become the easiest way to run away from interpersonal discomfort.  In many instances, though, this avoidance creates unnecessary issues.  One cannot easily convey sarcasm, for example, without the functionality of bold and italics. Then, there’s the danger of overusing CAPS — “yelling.”  Ironically, texting can take longer than a phone conversation because of the need to word a message precisely enough so that you are understood.  One must consider tone and diction, and maybe squeeze in some punctuation.  I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m ready for the arrival of the texting thesaurus.

Of course, in casual texting, who cares?  But I often text for business, which requires walking a fine line between friendliness and professionalism, not to mention making sure you don’t send one of those casual texts to the wrong entry in your address book.

All possible errors aside, texting is a fun and convenient way to keep up with the bits and pieces of many personal relationships at one time.  And it’s here to stay — at least until someone creates a mental telepathy app for the iPhone.

Do you have a love/hate relationship with texting?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Filed under: Social Issues | No Comments

Teaching Our Kids About Human Nature

How much worrying is too much?

When we fear all the bad things that can happen to our kids — specifically things that are perpetrated by child predators — what are we teaching them about human nature?

I love pondering existential topics such as this, but like many parents, I wonder where the line should be drawn between theory and the practice of parenting.

My obsession with human rights coincides with my belief in the essential goodness of humanity.  I don’t think people can be categorized as either “good” or “evil.”  This even applies to the most notorious of human figures: the Hitlers, the Saddams, the bin Ladens.  We don’t want to associate ourselves with these members of the human community, nor do we want to imagine that each of us is capable of committing similar atrocities.  But we are inextricably associated with them all, and we are capable of the same wrongdoing.

By collectively denying these facts, we breed generation after generation of paranoid warmongers and spend our lives trying to prove to ourselves, our communities, our deities that we are part of the good group.

This hits home when we project the products of our powerful imaginations upon our children.  They can’t ride their bikes down the street because we are afraid they will be kidnapped.  They can’t talk to strangers because people are apparently guilty until proven innocent when it comes to neighborly relations.

Yes, children get kidnapped, murdered, and raped.  But these dangers existed long before mass media allowed the stories, and the fear, to spread like wildfire.  Sometimes I think I should follow in my grandmother’s footsteps and keep a baseball bat next to my bed, but then I come to my senses.

That’s all it takes, really.  Common sense.  We need to wake up and realize that not everyone is out to get us.  The fact that terrible things comes to pass is somewhat of a self-fulfilling prophecy.  The more frightened you are, the greater target you will seem and the more likely you’ll be to exaggerate negative outcomes.

We should certainly equip our children with survival skills and teach them to follow their gut instincts, but often that means standing on the same side as the people with whom we have misunderstandings.

In my eyes, learning to recognize opportunities for establishing positive relationships is more important than steering clear of discomfort because of the remote possibility of danger.  I may be too trusting, though.

Are you a paranoid parent?  Where do you draw the line?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Filed under: Social Issues | 1 Comment

Having Children: Is It Really a Choice?

In my exploration of the blogosphere this afternoon, I came across an interesting site: The Childless by Choice Project.  By “interesting,” I mean unbelievable.  While I find the research presented on this site to be worthwhile — it explores the motives behind remaining childless — it is not convincing in its numbers or survey methods.  Nearly every person mentioned on this site and the accompanying blog is 30 or over and, in general, selfish.

My husband and I have pondered this issue together numerous times.  Thankfully, we agree that not wanting to have children is virtually ignoring the duties of membership in the human race.  We want to have a lot of kids because it feels right, regardless of whether they are convenient or affordable additions to our lives.

I have heard the argument before that it’s actually parents who are selfish; they want to produce beings who will worship them and love them unconditionally.  My response to that is: do you worship YOUR parents?   A child’s love is most definitely conditional.  Maybe we don’t realize until we become adults that our parents are not infallible, but surely we don’t always love them without limits.  If they provide for us as we think they should, we love them.  If they don’t, especially because they have abandoned us or committed any other heinous emotional or physical crimes, we don’t love them as much or at all.

Another point of contention for me is the suggestion that people should arbitrarily limit the amount of kids they have or choose not to have any because an excessive birth rate kills the planet even more quickly.  Trying to corroborate your belief with a haughty stance on environmental protection is just a dumb excuse.  Maybe if we all found ways to use fewer of the earth’s resources, we wouldn’t have to worry about the strain that overpopulation places on rainforests and polar bears.

I deem the view that parenthood is a choice, and a potentially ruinous one, to be a deleterious symptom of our individualistic culture.   When your life is all about going out to fancy dinners, shopping, leaving on spontaneous weekend getaways, and hanging out with your cat, of course parenting will throw more than a few kinks into it.

Get over it.  Either have kids when you’re young enough to handle it without whining about the life that you could have had, or go along your childless path without defending it so fervently.

The childless and vocal engender another battle in the procreation war by trying to drag their (supposedly miserable) parent friends out on the town, leading them to believe that it is acceptable, even normal, to continue engaging in a lifestyle which they left behind the moment the stick turned blue.  This mentality leaks into the world of parents with young children, and they begin wishing the years away before their progeny enter kindergarten.  Instead of relishing the days, they can’t wait to get rid of the carseats and bottles.  Kids and teenagers can feel it when their parents just want them out of the house, when they push them too roughly into independence and, ironically, create such dependence that they end up with college graduates under their roof later.  It is disgusting that the prevalent sense that children just get in the way, or that they are projects to be molded and then bragged about, affects both parents and non-parents alike.

The future of humanity requires that we reproduce, and to me, that’s the primary reason we should want to.  There are plenty of emotional benefits, and downsides, to being a parent, but none of them negates biological instinct.  Most of those arguments for or against becoming a parent are actually products of our time, and we should not be so short-sighted as to consider them law.

Do you think the availability of fertility treatments will help or hurt future generations?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Filed under: Family Life | 10 Comments

America’s Exceptional Independence

Certain occasions, including the 4th of July, offer us pause, a moment (or a whole hotdog-bingeing day) to consider the historical context for our celebration.  Beyond a fireworks-induced pride, though, few of us feel staunch emotion over the long summer weekend that seems, 200+ years post-independence, to have been made for lovers of flag cakes.

Having studied and written my thesis on American exceptionalism, I think I am more conflicted than most.  I still feel like I did the day that I landed back on U.S. soil after studying in Italy for three months: unsure of what my American identity means.  While abroad, I discovered that I felt a certain security in having an American accent and presenting myself as a product of America’s revered educational system.  My Asian and European peers expressed a fascination about U.S. culture that baffled me, but also instilled in me an awkward smugness.  I expected to be shamed as an unwilling representative of the Bush years, but instead I made quick friends and was told I wasn’t like the other (party-hardy) American kids.   So, if I wasn’t like them, did it mean something different for me to identify with my nationality?

I am now wholly appreciative of that seed of internal conflict because it launched me into a research project that required as much introspection as library time.  I unearthed the uncanny coexistence of good and evil in America’s record on human rights at the same time that I fought with my own desire to belong to a people, a government, with which I didn’t always agree.  One hundred pages and two years later, I still have the same questions.  To me, that’s a blessing, for it will hopefully propel me into a satisfying career as an ever-curious academic.  It is less clear how this plays into my life as a wife and mother.

To immigrants like my in-laws, the American flag symbolizes something much more layered than it ever will to me.  I have no other way to identify myself than as American; I am not directly connected to my ancestral culture and only know where half my family came from.  Liberal democracy is the status quo for me.  For those who can compare our freedoms to the lack thereof in an anecdotal way, America truly is the beacon of liberty it claims to be.  Those of us who do not have that point of reference seem to be more apt to critically appraise life and politics in this exceptional country.  From an academic standpoint, that is what we should do.  We are the governing body, according to the philosophical beating heart of American civic life, and have responsibilities along with rights.

Yet, that is not what I felt in the pit of my stomach when I stood in an anonymous crowd at Saturday night’s Shindig on the Green.  Holding my son on my hip as he gawked at his first fireworks show, the part of me that is hooked on tradition rose up and erased the guilt, the critical student of political science.  It was like American exceptionalism was once again showing me the other side of its face, the side of which I had first caught a glimpse amongst my international friends.  I am sure everyone around me felt it, too.

Whether it is something in the air, water, or fireworks, none of us knows.  Americans are individuals with radically varied experiences and opinions, but all that seems to matter is that we can stand side by side and sing along to patriotic songs (albeit drunkenly) without factionalizing our differences.  There are moments when we put all political passions and social causes aside and just stand together, and that is something that doesn’t happen consistently in any other place on earth.

It is that ability to blindfold ourselves that can sneak around the corner and surprise us with its capacity for malevolence.

We have to make a conscious decision to define what it is to be American for our children.  Will we do that by handing them sparklers and clothing them in red, white, and blue or by thoroughly informing them of America’s precarious role in the world and how they fit into it?  Can we achieve both?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Discovering My Race: A Stark Contrast

The theme of the July issue of The Sun magazine is race.  Funny, because that seems to have been a big theme in my life for the past three or four years.

Are you wondering why race is such a big deal to me if I’m white?

That’s precisely the paradox I’ve encountered.

My husband’s experiences as a Hispanic male, who often gets mistaken for African-American or biracial, have flooded my world with new realities.  I’ve learned that race is as relative a concept as age.  It doesn’t really matter if someone belongs to a given race, or even if that “race” is actually a race; it only matters how we treat them because of what we believe their category to be.  Hispanic, for example, is not considered a race in biological terms.  There are white, black, and red Hispanics.  About the only thing they share is language, and even in that arena there are more differences than similarities.  Yet, the burgeoning Hispanic minority in the U.S. has given the majority another reason to feel threatened, and another group upon which to project our xenophobia.

In true genetic terms, race is a no-thing.  All members of the human race are almost exactly alike (over 99% genetically similar).  According to the Human Genome Project, most genetic mutation is relatively new and has occurred among populations rather than across them.  Races, and the hatred thereof, are social constructions that have changed over time.

Tim Wise, author of White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son, says in his interview with The Sun:

“We are naturally predisposed to notice height, weight, eye color, skin color, facial features, hair texture.  But there is a difference between that and having antipathy toward other groups.  Also, the focus on skin color doesn’t make sense to me.  We have elevated its importance because powerful elites decided to do so.  Skin color hasn’t always been a primary concern.  The Greeks viewed the African kingdoms as far superior to Europeans, whom they thought were slow and stupid, even though they were closer in skin color to the Greeks.  In the colonies that would become the United States, white indentured servants and African slaves worked, lived, slept, and played together — and some in the Virginia colony even conspired together to overthrow their masters.  The elites needed a way to divide them, so they extended the notion of supremacy to servants of European descent and passed laws to segregate the races.  In a way segregation laws themselves are proof that racism isn’t natural.  If people naturally refused to associate with other races, there would be no need for laws to keep them apart” (6).

There are many other noteworthy quotes in the interview, the full text of which you can read here.

This section struck me, though, because I vividly remember being shocked during my sophomore year of college, when I learned that there had been white slaves in the colonies.  I felt like important identifying information had been withheld from me.  In middle and high school textbooks, we learn that blacks and whites played separate roles in early America because that makes it easier to maintain the balance of power and keep race relations in a box.  Whites are supposed to feel guilty (but take no action) and blacks are supposed to feel bitter (and also take no action).  After all, it’s the past…right?

In textbook-free reality, the construction of race as a divisor very much defines the present.  The problem is that it defines the white man’s world as secure, which provokes no inquiry and makes it impossible for a member of the influential majority to understand life at the bottom of the racial food chain.  We don’t even have the parameters with which to build unbreakable associations with minorities because we simply don’t see the world in black and white — we don’t have to.

When I was living in a dorm during my junior year of college, my husband (then boyfriend) would drive across town to see me.  He would always be hesitant to come late at night, and I didn’t understand why.  One night, though, he said he was on his way and didn’t show up.  I finally got him on the phone and he said he had been pulled over three times in a row in Winter Park (a rich suburb of Orlando), supposedly because he had a taillight out.  The true reason, which he knew better than I, was that driving an old Toyota Corolla through a Lexus town signified to police that he did not belong.  I had heard his stories about unjust run-ins with the law in the past, but didn’t completely get it until that night.  From then on, we drove through Winter Park in my Jetta, and he was safe by association.  It made me sick, but I felt hopeless and still do.

Our son looks white.  He has blue eyes and fair skin (though a few minutes of sun makes him tan like his dad).  His light brown hair hasn’t grown in yet, so we have no idea if he will look even slightly biracial.  When he was born, our friends and family were surprised that he looks more like me than like his father.  And, I wonder, were they secretly relieved?

We can only guess how he will define himself in a world that requires racial definition first and foremost.  Will he, like his mother, be immersed in and oblivious to white privilege because no one knows that he is part Cuban, part Puerto Rican?  Or will he surround himself with the symbols and tools of his Hispanic heritage and be singled out for it like his father and grandfather are?  It is a cruel miracle of sorts, that the chance meeting of chromosomes can produce two or more intensely different realities by virtue of phenotype.

Every day, I walk a line between the world of racial buzzwords (“tolerance,” “diversity”) in which I grew up and the world in which everything is characterized by race.  The latter is the one I never knew existed.

Perhaps I engaged in “white denial,” as Wise says, and I wanted to believe that I live in a just society.  I think it is more abstruse, though, and that I have a lot of catching up to do with my husband and everyone else who peered through a darker lens than mine in their formative years.  There is a lot that I simply don’t know, and never will, no matter how much I want to.  Continuing to share my ignorance and opening myself up to bad news will be a lifelong process.  For the first twenty years of my life, I stood on a foundation of certainty that my future would unfold in a positive direction, without searching for the origin of this assumption.  I now know that a large part of that transparent assumption lies in my literal transparency.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Filed under: Social Issues | 2 Comments

NYC Prep: Sad Reality

If you subscribe to my belief about TV not melting your soul, you have probably heard about the ridiculous new show on Bravo, NYC Prep.  It is essentially the teenaged version of The Real Housewives.  There are so many problems with this new vista on teen life, some of which I will list for you.

  1. The economy is floundering, yet these kids either don’t know or don’t have to care.  Nothing is more condescending than to show the inner workings of exaggerated wealth in America during a time when everyone else is sliding down the invisible scale of middle-classdom.  If you believe in trickle-down economics, you simply must tune in so that you can see, once and for all, that American socialites and their caviar-loving kids are not interested in laying their earnings beneath their pedicured feet so that the rest of us can try to reach for them.
  2. Parents are all but absent from these rich kids’ lives.  One girl lives with her brother in a lavish apartment on the Upper East Side and sees her parents once a week when they make the trek from their estate in the Hamptons to check on their kids in the city.  It particularly irks me to contrast that with my most recent read, David K. Shipler’s The Working Poor: Invisible in America.  Numerous subjects in this book get their children taken from them by DCF because of alleged neglect, which includes leaving their young teens home alone because they must work the night shift.  So, the message here is that, so long as your children are being chauffered around the city at night or partying in a gold-encrusted pad, it is fine to leave them parentless for days or weeks on end.  If you live in a roach-infested apartment in the least desirable neighborhood, you are endangering your children by leaving the house to provide for them.
  3. Though the show’s title suggests that it will be a saga about life at prep school, there is no school to be seen.  These kids of the hour never seem to step foot in a high school hallway, though they frequent NYC’s upscale restaurants and galleries like networking thirtysomethings.  The only mention of academics (at least in the one episode I could stand to watch) was one snob’s pronouncement that she must sneak in some community service hours so that she could get into Harvard.  She also lamented her less-than-perfect SAT scores, saying that she knew she could achieve perfection and she needed to take the test again.  While not surprising, it is still gut-wrenching that education means something far different for the privileged than for those struggling to exercise that elusive “equality of opportunity.”  For the kids of NYC Prep, school is more about setting oneself up for a prime social life than slaving away over Calculus homework, because all it will take for them to get into college is a quick wave of their parents’ checkbooks.
  4. Not unlike their counterparts at private colleges around the country, the males on the show derive their self-worth from hooking up with as many females as possible.  Of course this occurs in lower economic circles as well, but who else but the rich could get away with confessing to “getting with” 16 girls in one month on network television?  If a poor and/or non-white kid said that on TV, social workers and politicians would have a field day trying to diagnose and heal this promiscuity problem.  These boys, though, are likely encouraged by their parents (or at least not discouraged), despite that fact that many of them will be prominent political or business figures of the future.  Reputation wins out over morality, and to Beemer-driving playboys, the future consists of tomorrow’s conquest.
  5. The guys are only half the problem.  The females on the show compete for male attention by shunning the less worthy girls, the few who have parents breathing down their necks or who don’t shop nearly as often as they should.  They throw parties so that they can strut around like the pubescent animals they are and flirt mercilessly with every hair-flipping boy that shows up.  In many ways, gender stereotypes are worsened by wealth because women have the option of being trophy wives and pretending to be housewives with successful careers while their nannies raise the children.  NYC Prep doesn’t prep young girls for anything but a Mrs. degree.

Maybe I am ultra-sensitive to this scene because I have been exposed to it for so much of my life.  Even in public high school, the rich kids were the most visible and lived completely unfettered by normal teenaged concerns.  Attending a private college and tutoring prep school kids has shown me that this world exists beyond the set of an inane reality program.  In fact, it is much worse than the broadcasted portrayal.  I am annoyed, but mostly saddened, by our glorification of extravagance because it has real consequences that even the most intimate show can’t help us understand.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Filed under: Social Issues | 2 Comments